US Army General Admits Using AI for Key Military Decisions

Introduction

Artificial intelligence is no longer just a tool for tech companies—it’s becoming a core part of modern warfare. Major General William ‘Hank’ Taylor of the US Army recently revealed that he relies on AI platforms like ChatGPT for crucial military decisions. This admission not only underscores the rapid integration of AI into defense strategies but also raises questions about ethics, security, and the future of battlefield decision-making.

He also thinks that decisions on the battlefield are going to be made “at machine speed”https://t.co/sbtwGg4bRA

— Dexerto (@Dexerto) October 17, 2025

AI in the US Military: A Growing Trend

General Taylor, who commands US Army forces in South Korea, stated:

“I’m asking to build, trying to build models to help all of us. As a commander, I want to make better decisions. I want to make sure that I make decisions at the right time to give me the advantage.”

He emphasized that AI can provide commanders with time-based advantages, allowing decisions to be made at “machine speed” rather than traditional human speed. This reflects a broader military trend: using AI for strategy, risk assessment, and operational planning.

The Public Revelation

The news gained traction through X (formerly Twitter), where Dexerto reported Taylor’s comments:

“A top US Army general admits to using AI to make key military decisions. Major General William ‘Hank’ Taylor also added 'Chat and I' have become 'really close lately'.”

This sparked widespread reactions online, from memes to debates about national security. Many users raised concerns about sharing sensitive data with AI systems.

Ethical and Security Concerns

While AI can optimize battlefield decisions, it also poses potential risks:

• Data Sensitivity: AI systems may retain confidential military information.
• Foreign Influence: BrainCo’s sharing of EEG data with China raises questions about global AI collaboration and security.
• Decision-Making Accountability: Relying heavily on AI blurs the line between human judgment and machine guidance, creating ethical dilemmas.

Military officials continue to debate how much autonomy should be delegated to AI systems in warfare.

Potential Impact on Global Warfare

Taylor predicts a future where AI determines battlefield winners, a scenario where speed and data-driven insights outperform traditional strategies. If widely adopted, AI could reshape global defense doctrines, forcing countries to invest in similar technologies to remain competitive.

FAQs

Q1: Which AI tools are used by the US Army?
Currently, platforms like ChatGPT are used for modeling, decision simulations, and information analysis.

Q2: Is AI decision-making safe in military operations?
While AI can enhance speed and accuracy, it poses risks related to sensitive data leaks and ethical accountability.

Q3: Could AI replace human generals?
AI assists commanders but cannot fully replace human judgment, especially for complex ethical or unpredictable scenarios.

Q4: How widespread is AI use in the military?
It is growing, with applications in operational planning, simulations, training, and risk assessments, particularly in technologically advanced countries.

Conclusion

The US Army’s embrace of AI signals a pivotal shift in modern warfare. General Taylor’s admission shows that AI is no longer just a supporting tool—it is shaping decisions at the highest levels. While the technology offers unprecedented speed and strategic advantages, it also brings ethical, security, and accountability challenges. As AI continues to integrate into military operations, the world must balance innovation with caution, ensuring that machine-driven decisions enhance rather than compromise global safety.

In essence, AI in the military is not a futuristic concept—it’s a present reality reshaping how wars are strategized, fought, and won. The coming years will determine whether human wisdom can coexist with machine efficiency, or if “machine speed” will redefine the rules of engagement entirely.